Summary of Jacob Nordangård: UN/WEF openly planning to use the CO2 scam to control us | Tom Nelson Pod #86

This is an AI generated summary. There may be inaccuracies.
Summarize another video · Purchase summarize.tech Premium

00:00:00 - 00:40:00

Science and technology historian Jacob Nordangård discusses the history of climate policy and the motivations behind the involvement of influential actors such as the Rockefeller Foundation and the German Monist Fund in funding climate science. He also talks about the United Nations' plans to digitize and measure people's carbon emissions to manage climate change, which he believes is a way for them to control people. Nordangård highlights the influence of the World Economic Forum in promoting effective multilateralism and a borderless world, and the growing Great Awakening happening among people. He also speculates on the potential replacement of Greta Thunberg as the face of the youth climate movement and questions the need for a new digital system to measure carbon dioxide activity.

  • 00:00:00 In this section, Jacob Nordangård, a science and technology historian, discusses his research on the history of climate policy, including how influential actors such as the Rockefeller Brothers and German Monist Fund funded meetings that aimed to establish the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) and discuss the goals of the climate change movement. Nordangård also highlights his latest book, "The Digital World Brain," which describes the United Nations' plans to digitize and measure people's carbon emissions in order to manage climate change. He emphasizes his mistrust of Amazon, where his books are not available, as it is a big part of the digitized society he writes about.
  • 00:05:00 In this section, Jacob Nordangård discusses the history of the involvement of the Rockefeller Foundation in climate science. He traces it back to a 1952 meeting of the Rockefeller-funded Population Council, where the issue of global population control was discussed. This meeting included Roger Revelle, who was influential in bringing attention to the anthorpogenic theory of climate change. Nordangård suggests that this background shows that the Rockefeller Foundation's involvement in climate science may be motivated by a desire for international power and influence through organizations like the United Nations.
  • 00:10:00 In this section, Jacob Nordangård discusses the motivations behind the founding of the Rockefeller Foundation and Rockefeller Brothers Fund's involvement in funding climate science, particularly in the study of man's impact on the climate. He notes that the motivation behind their involvement was control, specifically control over population and resources. Nordangård also talks about the evolution of the two main schools of thought regarding climate change during the 1970s, with one school believing that humans were influencing climate through carbon dioxide and fossil fuel combustion, and the other believing that humans were responsible for releasing aerosols from fossil fuel combustion. The conversation ends with speculation on whether climate change attribution would change if the climate started cooling again.
  • 00:15:00 In this section, Jacob Nordangård discusses how the Rockefeller Network has had a significant role in shaping climate change policy, with members of the network involved in funding climate scientists who would later influence the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). The Rockefeller Brothers fund was also involved in both sides of the climate debate, funding both opinion influencing campaigns about climate change and the Global Climate Coalition, a group that was skeptical of climate change in the 1980s. Nordangård also mentions that ExxonMobil had been associated with skeptic views on climate change but abandoned these views in the early 2000s.
  • 00:20:00 In this section, Jacob Nordangård discusses how the UN and the World Economic Forum are using the CO2 scam to control people. He explains that his former colleagues at the university still believe in the scam, but ordinary people are not impressed and can see the negative effects such as increased fuel prices and unreliable power. Nordangård believes that Sweden will experience more realism in the future after the energy crisis with Ukraine and Russia and the effect on the European energy market. However, he notes that there is a problem with inexperienced young women in leadership positions who have been indoctrinated with certain messages about the climate. In terms of Greta Thunberg's protests, Nordangård says that the more educated or indoctrinated people are, the more they like her, but ordinary people are not that impressed.
  • 00:25:00 In this section, Jacob Nordangård discusses the background of Greta Thunberg's emergence as the face of the youth climate movement. He explains that the movement was planned at a meeting organized by the United Nations and the Club of Rome in Germany in 2015. They aimed to make climate change more interesting for young people and suggested that a climate strike could be effective. The organizers later found Greta Thunberg, whose parents are famous people in Sweden, and made her a star. Nordangård also speculates that there might be a move to replace Greta with a new face of the youth climate movement, such as Sophia Kiani, but the focus on young people will continue as it is an important part of the United Nations' agenda.
  • 00:30:00 In this section, Jacob Nordangård discusses how climate change is a major issue that the United Nations has worked tirelessly on. However, he believes that there is an agenda behind the climate change narrative that people need to be aware of. Nordangård thinks that people need to expose the new system that is supposed to work and how counterproductive it is. He questions the need to build a new digital system that is connected with everything and measures carbon dioxide activity. Nordangård also mentions the influence of the World Economic Forum and the big financial institutions, including central bankers, in pushing a Central Bank digital currency and implementing a new system.
  • 00:35:00 In this section, Jacob Nordangård discusses how the World Economic Forum (WEF) has become more influential in recent times, particularly since the signing of the Paris Agreement in 2015. He notes that the WEF promotes effective multilateralism and wants to create a borderless world in which multinational corporations have a greater say in global governance. Nordangård references a UN report called "Our Common Agenda," which lays out plans for a more manageable and efficient world that overrides the capitalist system. He also notes that more people are receptive to his work now than they were several years ago, as there seems to be a growing Great Awakening happening.
  • 00:40:00 In this section, Jacob Nordangård talks about the interest his work received when the pandemic was declared in 2020, as he had already written about the World Economic Forum. He mentions his book that explains the fusion of the United Nations and the World Economic Forum and its impact on the world. Nordangård believes that we have some time before we get a global Central Bank digital currency, but if social credits become integrated into society, this will happen within 10 years to prevent CO2-induced bad weather.

Copyright © 2024 Summarize, LLC. All rights reserved. · Terms of Service · Privacy Policy · As an Amazon Associate, summarize.tech earns from qualifying purchases.